🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.