🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations worked, and shared new appeals had been made by mediators to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is navigating a complex path since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, Western states exercised their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with the US representative the American negotiator only for the agreement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if talks resume.

Trump recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that misuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He stated the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence challenging to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently attempted to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the primary resolution to settle disputes, but its requirements, rules and principles must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the wake of this attack."